greeny said: (2010-05-16 21:36:25 Rating:)

For a couple of weeks last year, I was getting unusually frequent advertisements for the Premium version. But I've been using their free version for 11 years, this was an unusual occurrence, and it didn't last. With a 1.6 GHz dual core, 3.6 GB of ram, and Windows XP, Ad-Aware uses the CPU heavily for about 5 minutes every time the computer is rebooted, or when Ad-Aware is disabled and re-enabled. Of course, XP doesn't need booting frequently, and disabling is never necessary. I like having it providing real-time protection. Who knows how effective it is. The scanner function is still available. I'm also running PC Tools Spyware Doctor and Avast Antivirus, both free versions.

billytehkid said: (2010-04-20 09:50:19 Rating:)

its ok if you have the resources to run it. but for older computers this will take alot of recourses. free version keeps asking to suscribe to the primum version

LukeQuietus said: (2010-04-17 16:52:53 Rating:)

Highly over-rated. Similar to AVG, this program was good about 3-5 years ago but since then they\\\'ve been depending on the name they built for themselves then and haven\\\'t really gotten any better, while the viruses and spyware out there has. Under-achieving.

victo enrique moyano b. said: (2010-04-14 00:20:08 Rating:)

se trata de un programa muye fectivo pra los adware y espias con una rpofunda accion de analise y sobre todo es gratis encontrandose más omenos al nivel de malwerebyte

tony said: (2010-03-20 10:24:35 Rating:)

I have used this app for two years and as a home user,i find this to be the best free version on the market,i would reccommend to anyone,and above all its safe.If you dont have it yet,get it!!